🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange made a significant forecast – not just the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came large groups of votes added after that and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for him, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed Zohran this year. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the election was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he does so then no one can say the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative area. That really surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist areas with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were major surprises on this one, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – people will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.